charles rangeley-wilson – writing about fishing, travel, rivers, conservation

Restoration Drama

The first in a series of blogs for river restorationists. The reason why nothing has appeared on here for the past four months: I’ve been a bit busy helping the Norfolk Rivers Trust deliver a handful of river restoration projects on the River Nar. This one at a site near Castle Acre will start the series because today is the birthday, or rather the re-incarnation day of a lost river. The aerial photo (1946) below shows a part of the River Nar which was changed from its natural course hundreds of years ago when the mill-leat for the downstream mill was cut: the straight channel flowing down the west (left) side of the image. Look east a few yards however and you’ll see evidence in the ground of the abandoned river. In fact it was left there, unfilled and unchanged from the day it was cut off by the leat until today, the 11th of November 2014.

This relic channel is a true rarity on English chalk-streams. More or less every yard of every river has been modified for one reason or another. To find five hundred yards left more or less as the Ice-Age made them was the rivery equivalent of finding the tomb of Tutankhamun. The relic channel was cut off at its upper end and at the lower end was joined to the mill-leat by another straight, man-made channel. This project then was about re-instating the old channel by creating a short linking channel upstream and a longer more natural one re-connecting back to the meandering part of the main river downstream.

The lower channel accounted for 80% of the project time. The available route passed through a slightly raised part of the flood-plain and in the middle reaches it was a challenge to peel away enough ground to make the correct, naturally shallow cross-section. There was little fall to play with too and the main river to which the new channel returned has been dredged (a future project will be sorting that out) and so tuning the gradient proved very tricky. It was worth the effort though. When the flows finally broke through the new channel worked perfectly, with good velocity and no unintentional impoundments.

Restoring the relic channel was as close to actual river restoration as is possible: like peeling varnish off an old painting. A delicate job if the painting is not to be damaged. In practice we went so lightly that it was quite easy. Helen Mandley supervised with an eagle eye and Wayne on the digger performed with great sensitivity. See the photos below for the fuller picture. Amazingly there was very little sediment in the relic channel. Within an hour the flows had scoured their way to the gravel.

Some will know that Nigel Holmes sadly passed away a few weeks ago: it may well have been Nigel who first identified this as potential restoration project in a report (which he co-authored) commissioned by English Nature about ten years ago. This project has been a team effort over the years and Nigel’s early involvement is a reminder of that. I’m sure he would have been chuffed to see it come to fruition. The delivery team included WWF and Coca Cola as sponsors, the Norfolk Rivers Trust as planners and supervisors (Helen Mandley ran the project, and I was there to help fret about gradients, planforms and cross-sections), the Norfolk Rivers Drainage Board (machinery and delivery – thanks to Adrian, Wayne and Graham), Richard Hey, Holkham Estate, The Castle Acre Fishing Club, Natural England and others.

Emmanuel's3

The red lines mark the new connecting channels. The blue lines mark the “lost” relic channel.

DSCF5491

The old mill leat. The channel is too wide and straight and has been dredged in places too: which is why it is over-run with burr-reed, while the river tries to establish a more appropriately-sized channel along one edge.

DSCF5496

This is the ground which the new connecting channel was cut through at the lower end of the project: an old poplar plantation and defunct pheasant pen.

DSCF5533

The relic channel under the trees. The water in this image is just flood-plain seepage, which amounted to just enough flow to keep the channel viable for the past two centuries. Note the shallow profile of the un-modified banks. The channel is shallow too, only 30 cm deep, with a bed of hard gravel under a thin layer of sediment.

DSCF5636

The relic channel in the open meadow. Here the old river is almost lost under vegetation, although in practice it was quite easy to uncover it. Note the shallow banks and the fabulous tussocks which the river meanders between. The bed is hard gravel in a shallow channel under a thin layer of sediment.

DSCF5645

The relic channel revealed. Without touching the bed or banks the weed was peeled aside and folded over onto the edges of the stream.

DSCF5649

Helen Mandley of the Norfolk Rivers Trust making sure the digger doesn’t damage the bed of the relic channel. The operation was a wetter version of peeling varnish of an old painting: just enough to reveal what’s underneath.

DSCF5666

The new channel flowing where the pheasant pen used to be. Still something of a moonscape it will be softened in due course by large woody debris and plants in and along the edges of the channel. The important thing was to replicate the dimensions and planform of the relic channel upstream. Establishing half-a-dozen subtle riffles when there was very little fall to play with was quite a challenge, as was creating shallow banks when the floodplain on the available route was slightly higher than ideal.

DSCF5667

Another view of the new channel.

DSCF5670

A wonderful moment: the relic channel flowing as the main River Nar for the first time in about two hundred years. It looks happy!

DSCF5675

The same wonderful moment upstream: the river looks almost pre-historic. This is a very special site now: a reference reach of an unmodified English chalk-stream. Hen’s teeth are more common.

11 Responses to “Restoration Drama”

  1. Simon Dixon

    Charles, great post. Nice to see a genuine example of river “restoration” in practice! It’s a much over-used phrase for generally improving degraded rivers, but in this case the project team look to have actually turned the clock back. Look forward to reading about the rest of the projects!
    I hope you don’t mind but I have “reblogged”/linked this from the river management blog.

  2. rangeley

    Hi Simon,

    many thanks. I don’t mind the re-blog at all. It’s all about sharing knowledge … or lessons learned!

    And yes, I agree ‘restoration’ is often used when instead the project is more of a form of habitat enhancement. ‘Restoration’ implies a specific idea of what is being restored. But our rivers have been so heavily modified over the centuries, so what state are we restoring? My take is that there are basic physical characteristics in un-modified ‘natural’ rivers (which is why this relic channel is so interesting), in planform, cross-section, homogeneity etc. and that restoration is about trying to restore those characteristics whilst also making room for the layered history of the river.

    Best, Charles.

  3. John Brophy

    What a fascinating project to be involved in. I wonder are there may more relict streams out there waiting to be found.

    John

  4. rangeley

    Hi John,

    I’m sure there are. In Norfolk there’s a great historic maps website which allows you to look back over 1946 aerial photos, 19thC OS maps and in places tithe maps. You can use these and satellite images to find old river courses. But this one we restored stood out because the channel was so pristine and hidden away on a piece of land that hadn’t changed or been used much in all that time.

    But I’m sure there would be sites like this on the limestone streams of Ireland.

    best,

    Charles.

  5. The tuesday swim

    Dear Charles,
    Truly wonderful work and good to see a natural looking chalk stream. Will this stream ever be fished? The riverbank looks to be of a delicate nature. Perhaps there could be a totally new approach to fly fishing these small streams by standing two to three metres back from the waters edge (good practice anyway) before taking a cast. Although done in a sensitive manner I always found rivers like the Itchen too manicured and controlled.
    Keep up with the good work this really is a positive piece of ecology which makes for a refreshing change.
    Best
    Nick

  6. rangeley

    At the upper end the peat and turf that came out of the diversion have been placed behind some LWD in the old leat channel to help divert the main-flow: but this only forms a short berm. Downstream of this point there will still be flow in the old leat because it picks up several springs. It will become a gently seeping, linear pond of sorts. Personally I feel that retaining these previous incarnations in one form or other is desirable, especially if they can become habitat features in their own right.

  7. rangeley

    Thanks Nick. The river is fished lightly … and has never been stocked!

  8. Jon Wood

    I am open-mouthed with admiration; I used to walk in this tiny corner of dreams amongst the agridesert a quarter-century ago, and had always wondered how the stream had been subsumed by that crazy swamp.
    A fascinating account. I shall return again this summer to view your remarkable efforts & raise a pint to you in The Ostrich.

  9. rangeley

    Hi Jon,
    thanks for that. I really appreciate it. It’ll look a lot better in the summer too. The scars and stitching are still visible at the mo.
    Charles.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

%d bloggers like this: